Loving someone means so many things; some of it is simple and straight-forward, but much of it is complicated. Loving your obnoxious teenager, for example, can be hard (e.g., me, from 12-19 wasn’t a cakewalk for my parents). Loving your parents or siblings despite the random things they do/say or have done/said is just a soul-deep thing and I’ve realized that I can only accept who they are and love that real person and try to understand them. But there’s that you’re-a-part-of-me love deeply embedded. However, sharing your life with someone you love, a partner, a helpmate, is much harder.
When it comes to spouses, most likely, you were not raised together and you do not share ALL the same values, likes, dislikes, hopes, and dreams. Hopefully, you share most of those things, but it’s nigh impossible to share all of them. But you suck it up and compromise. It’s all about deciding how much it’s worth enduring x, y, and z to make your spouse happy, and trying to see your own benefits.
For example, my husband is not a fan of the beach, shopping, or carnivals… but that’s what our visit to Cape May (wonderfully arranged and paid for by my very loving older sister, who also paid for a hotel room so I, with my fibromyalgia, could have sanctuary from the 24-hr-a-day craziness that is two 6-yr-olds and an 8-yr-old) essentially was filled with, along with lots of time with my older siblings (my sister-in-law I count as a sibling, since she’s been in my life since I was in preschool) and niece and nephews, as well as my father. In addition to enduring something that is not his idea of a fun vacation, he paid for it with a vicious sunburn on his feet and ankles, in addition to all the driving, seasickness on the ferry, and mild sunburn on the front of his upper body. It was my idea of a spectacular vacation, but it wouldn’t have happened if it was just the two of us. However, we both love the kids, and I adore my siblings as well, and we see them so rarely that my husband agreed to come along (I told him I’d be okay going alone if he didn’t want to or feel comfortable with missing work) and partake in the family fun.
In the past week or two, I’ve discovered that a lot of our life together is compromising and making the most of it (as well as thoroughly enjoying what we do share). I’ve also come to realize that a few of the things I assumed I’d do in my life just aren’t going to happen, which makes me sad.
For example, I like to travel even to local places, sit at an outdoor restaurant or cafe and take in the local color. Just people-watch. Peter really isn’t into that. He likes activities. Our honeymoon in Athens was the kind of thing that did both, we’d visit places, go on tours, but we also had to eat and it was off-season, so I could take in the local color at a taverna. However, future vacations aren’t as easy a compromise when it’s just the two of us. But we’ll see.
One thing that won’t change is that I’m a dog person and really want the option of one day having a dog (for example, if we have a yard and our kid(s) are of an age to help out and take that responsibility on). But my husband is decidedly not a dog person and does not want a dog in our home, did not want “a dog yard” at our home back when we lived in Western NY, and just thinks cats are less bother and kids have more of a pay-off, so why get a dog (which is like a life-long 18-month-old)?
I also really want to help kids more than I have been able to do as a teacher – I always wanted to adopt or foster a set of siblings (2 or 3, most likely one of which has special needs) that found their way into “the system” and are not young enough (<2) to be instantly picked up. Or just foster/adopt a few local kids over the age of 4. Give them a life they couldn’t otherwise have had. This would have been in addition to kids I gave birth to. But my husband doesn’t like the idea of adopting, especially if we have our own kids but even if we couldn’t…
But the one thing that really, truly bothers me now is getting pregnant and raising kids of our own. I want 4 (well, at least 3 and up to 5) kids, but he wants 2 (maybe 3). In addition to that, my husband is a born child-wrangler. He just knows how to take care of them, how to be firm, how to be silly, how to engage them in a self-perpetuating game without anything interesting around to use… And he loves kids. (I also love kids and feel that we’re better equipped than most to be good parents to kids whether they’re smart or average or have special needs or have special gifts.)
I felt I was depriving him of having children of his own while he’s still young, but he told me a couple of days ago that he does not have the patience yet and has growing-up to do. He’s not yet up to the 24-hour parental lifestyle, with its unending paraphernalia, the planning that surrounds even the simplest trips, and the noise and commotion that can randomly occur when he’s just not in the mood to cope with it… That’s his compromise to deal with my situation (I need to be well from fibromyalgia for at least a year before we’ll start trying, and closer to a healthy weight).
Meanwhile, I’ve been thinking: I’m 30. Let’s say I’m magically better enough in 6 months to start counting down a year and go off all my meds but 1 tricyclic antidepressant and the occasional 0.25mg klonipin (which frightens me and even just the hormones alone would put me under significant psychiatric watch) so we can start trying to conceive. This would make me 32 years old at the birth of baby #1. My husband wants them to be far apart, but I’m thinking they should be as close together as possible, considering the whole insufficient-and-uncomfortable-depression-meds issue (if I manage to not have to worry about postpartum depression or complications, etc.). But let’s say we wait a year, then start trying again… baby #2 will come around my 35th birthday. That’s if we’re cutting it close and under ideal circumstances. I thought of “rushing” it, decreasing the amount of time I’m on low meds, but my OB/GYN told me she would strongly recommend against using any hormonal “instigator” (such as Clomid) to make conception faster, since hormone levels are higher (which would amplify my depression, anxiety, etc) and drastically increase the possibility of twins. She said that conceiving and carrying multiples, such as twins, exponentially increases developmental risks to the fetuses, risks to my own body, amplifies the hormone craziness, and makes post-partum depression far more likely and more severe.
So I won’t have 5 kids. I might not even have a 3rd child. And the thing with siblings is, the more you have, the more likely you are to be really close to at least 1 of them, which is what helps families stick together during the hard times. My husband may not be close to his sister, but I bet if he had 1 or 2 more siblings, there’d have been 1 he’d identified with. I have 4 living siblings and I am now close to them all, but have a different and interesting bond with each of them. I want my children to have that, too. Maybe, once I’m over 35, they’ll give me Clomid and I’ll carry twins. Or maybe, if I’ve been trying and charting for 6 cycles without success, they’ll do that. Or we’ll shell out the money for IVF if the first time or two required more than one cycle of hormones, and then I might carry twins or triplets. Or maybe we’ll have 2 kids, each of which is a handful for whatever reason, and the idea of a third would just be too much and we’ll be content being able to make do with being seated easily at restaurants and only needing one stroller. Who knows?
All I know is that I love my husband dearly and want a happy life with him, regardless of what compromises we make in order for that to happen.